Behaviour Driven Development (BDD) is 'outside-in' software
development methodology, which has changed the tester's role
dramatically in recent years. One of the key benefit of BDD, is
communication enhancement. BDD has encouraged a collaborative way
of working between product owners, business analysts, project
managers scrum masters, developers and testers, resulting in a
higher level of customer satisfaction. BDD doesn't replace QA
testing but it has changed the approach to testing dramatically. In
this short article let's find out how a QA individual can bring
quality and business value into BDD projects.
A few words about BDD
Just in case you are new to BDD, it's a term coined by Dan North
to overcome the pitfalls in Test Driven Development and bridge the
communication gap between business and technology. In a summary, it
works like this:
• Write some user stories.
• Capture the intended behaviour in the form of 'features' or
examples BEFORE writing any code [Specification By Example]
• Think of all possible scenarios that cover the intended
functionality, reducing the risk of creating bugs.
• Implement the behaviour in the form of 'step definitions'.
• Passing tests verify that the implementation of the behaviour
has been successful.
Positive results from adopting BDD
• Bridge the communication gap between business and
• Faster feedback
• Business and technology speaking the same language
• Business people start engaging in technology
Where does the Tester fit in to all of
Developers play a key role in BDD by writing step definitions in
order to implement a system's behaviour. Once these steps are
implemented, the tests are effectively automated, the benefit is a
reduction in manual test effort.
If developers undertake most of the work in BDD projects, then
the burning question arises, "Why do we need testers in a BDD
Just because you start automating tests it doesn't mean you
don't need QA. It simply provides more time for the tester to do
they really want to do, proper, considered exploratory testing.
Here are some tips for testers to make BDD efficient and
• Know BDD Process
As a QA, It's very important to understand the basic concepts of
Behaviour Driven Development. The QA process is different from
SCRUM or any other methodologies. BDD is an 'out-side in'
development methodology, so all the evil thinking that we use to
find defects post development, has to be used before writing code.
This will help to prevent bugs rather than finding bugs.
Identification of all possible scenarios will help to massively
reduce the number of bugs entering the system.
In BDD, a "bug is a missing scenario". Therefore, if you find
something not working after implementation it could mean you
haven't identified that scenario before. As QA, you should act like
'quality police' throughout the project. Your role should be to
prevent defects in the early stage of implementation. Be proactive
in obtaining all possible information from any source, be it the
internet, books, forums or meeting other BDD practitioners.
• Get Involved Early
It's very important to get involved in early stage of the
project. It will help you to know the ins and outs of the
requirements, which will help you in designing scenarios. It is
also important know scope of the project and design sensible
scenarios. Mostly, project managers make the mistake of not
involving QA in the early meetings of a project, therefore, the QA
guys always lag behind. This is a major cause of why many projects
didn't work out well. All the teams should realise that QA plays a
major role in driving a BDD project. As QA, you should think
through all possible scenarios regardless if they are making sense.
Every scenario you think about may prevent a bug in the system.
Remember, if you miss any scenario this MAY turn into a defect in
the implemented system.
• Be Knowledgeable
Being knowledgeable is nothing less than gathering all the
business requirements and thinking of all the possibilities
surrounding them, confirming this with the product owner. Once you
have a complete understanding of the behaviour, you can provide
much better insight for what the developers have to implement. In a
team, you should be as knowledgeable as the next person. With so
many eyes on the project, it is much more likely that bad smells
will be uncovered. In most teams, the communication between product
owner, developer and tester is not as effective as it could be. It
is very important that you should know the ins and outs of the
system as much as the developer to make a BDD project a
• Take a Leading Role in Specification
Specification workshops are an opportunity for testers to be
proactive in asking questions, in order to get clear requirements
from your product owner and discuss all possible scenarios. You
should play key role in this meeting. If you fail to understand the
systems behaviour in this meeting, then the chances are you will
lag behind. Ideally, you should ask business owners a sensible list
of questions, which in turn become acceptance tests. Here you can
use your evil thinking to break the software before implementation.
We are used to breaking software after implementation by applying
every possible technique to break the software. It is challenging,
but you need to apply those techniques before implementation, so
bugs can be prevented from entering the system. In the
specification workshop, you shouldn't use 'GivenWhenThen' language.
Proper communication is the key in this meeting, using your
experience in writing acceptance tests, you just need to make sure
you have identified and discussed all possible scenarios of the
desired system. Group thinking is important in the scenario design
process because we are distilling the user stories with different
mindsets. Mostly, business analyst used to think about happy paths.
Developers used to think about edge cases in terms of an
implementation. Testers used to think in a way that how to break
the system. Different perceptions in the specification workshop
makes requirements more clearer and unambiguous.
• Write Better Feature Files
Once you have all necessary communication with business, next
step is to write feature files. Ideally, QA should take lead to
write down all scenarios, preconditions and expected results in the
form of feature files. Business analysts / product owners or even
scrum masters can contribute to feature files. Once the team agrees
all possible scenarios have been covered, then developers can kick
A few tips to write better feature files:
1. Use Background
Gherkin is a Domain Specific Language used to describe features
in the 'GivenWhenThen' format. Gherkin has some cool features in
order to avoid duplication or repetitive steps. Gherkin helps
readability for business users. Proper use of the 'background'
feature of Gherkin can help to avoid repetitive tasks in each
scenario. It is not mandatory to use 'background' in each and every
feature, but it makes the feature file more readable. There are few
things you need to keep in mind while using 'background'. You have
to keep your background section very short, just enough to keep the
scenario in context. You shouldn't include technical stuff like
starting some services, clearing cache, launching browsers in the
background, as the reader will assume these things. You'll
implement this in the step definitions by using proper hooks.
2.Use of Data Tables, Examples, Doc String, Multiple
tables of example & nested steps
Gherkin provides ability to enhance your feature files by using
tables. You can use 'Data Tables'. Data tables allow you to set-up
certain set of data as a pre-condition for the tests (Given) or as
an example in assertions (Then). You need to use 'Scenario Outline'
to extend feature files by examples. Doc String is another cool
feature of Gherkin which allows you to hard-code 'text' into your
feature files e.g. you can write email message in the quotes as an
assertion. Gherkin also allows you to specify multiple tables of
examples. Nesting Steps means hiding the implementation
3.Use tags and Sub-folders to organise
Tagging the features/scenarios with certain tags helps
categorise them into different groups. You can apply a filter to
run the features/scenarios with specific tags. You can also create
sub-folders according to the functionality to organise features
Here is an example feature file covering almost all the above
In order to secure my website
as a business owner
I want to implement login functionality
Background: Given I am on login page
@wip @smoke @browser @ci
Scenario Outline: Check user's login credentials
Given I filled <username> <email> and
When I clicked on Login
Then I should see <success or failure> message
And I should get an email saying:
You have just tried
to login to our system. If your login is successful then you will
get another email to verify you details.
Examples: Valid login
|username |email |password |success or failure|
|Andy |firstname.lastname@example.org |abcd1234 |success |
|Mike |email@example.com |abcd1234 |success |
Examples: InValid login
|username |email |password |success or failure |
|Andy |firstname.lastname@example.org| |failure |
• Watch Developers & Understand the Code-Base
Remember, you're not finished once you've written solid feature
files. The next step is to keep watch on how these features are
being implemented by the development team without disturbing them.
It would be an additional benefit to see how the programmers
organise and re-factor their code. You should try to implement some
features/scenarios by your own by referring the step definitions
written by developers. This approach will speed up the implantation
process. You should be fully aware of the test code, as you will be
the owner of the test code. You should know how to fix those tests
in case they got broken in future.
• Balance Tester / Developer Collaboration
Collaborative working is always better in agile team but we need
to balance the time we are spending with developers with the
business value we are getting from collaboration. We shouldn't slow
down developers by them spending hours and hours explaining the
code base. This will definitely slow down the developer's workflow.
Always come up with list of questions/concerns and ask for a
suitable time to discuss those questions with the developers. This
time should be covered in the estimation to keep things on
• Ensure You Are Writing the Correct Tests
There should be proper balance between API level tests and
interface tests. Service level tests are fast and stable while
interface tests are brittle, slow and easy to break. You need to
analyse the business value of features that need to be run in real
browser. You also need to select proper libraries and tools in
order to run interface tests.
• Debug the tests
In case you get enough time during the feature implementation,
don't forget to debug the implemented steps with developers, by
providing different test data, or verifying negative test
scenarios. This will help identify tests that are give false
• Drive the Continuous Integration
Continuous Integration is key for successful agile projects. As
a QA, you should drive the continuous integration. Keep a keen
watch on the builds. Ensure the builds are always green before
deployment. Visible continuous integration monitors highlight
misdemeanors and help to ensure quality in the BDD projects. Choose
proper continuous integration tool which has powerful reporting
features including HTML reporting, charts, graphs etc. This will
help non-technical people to analyse test reports.
• Consider living documentation
Living documentation is the specifications of the system to in
the form of automated feature file which can be edited by an
authorised person. Your nicely written feature files should be the
living documentation. You should have some collaborative tools to
keep all your feature files accessible by everyone. It wouldn't be
a good idea to tell non-technical people to go to the source
control system to read feature files. Living documentation should
be easily accessible without any technical constraints.
• Be active
Remember, BDD is a collaborative process, you should be an
active throughout entire project. Don't just be a click tester who
run specific suite of tests after every iteration or who just busy
in writing automation framework with heads down. You should be
active and talk to the team about the progress of implementation.
It's all about understanding the product with proper
In BDD, there are few things you shouldn't do or shouldn't allow
the team to do. Success of BDD projects depends on proper
collection and execution of the business requirements. Below are
the some of the points you should keep in mind and avoid as much as
• Don't Allow Developers to Change Feature
It may happen that developers wish to change the feature files
as per their need so that implementation becomes easier for them. A
feature the team has agreed could be complicated to implement, or
the developer feels that by changing the feature file they can make
code more robust and re-usable. Whatever the case, you shouldn't
change the feature files unless agreed by team and business people.
Changing feature files means indirectly changing in the
requirements. As a technology team we shouldn't change requirements
unless agreed by business.
• Don't Slow Down Developers/Delivery
BDD projects are very volatile in nature and everybody in the
team has tight schedule in terms of the task assigned to them.
Developers always complain that testers are passive and
non-technical so they have spend more time with them. It is quite
natural that testers are not that technical, so they always need
some help from developers, for example, in setting up the
environments, or setting up the projects on their local machine. As
a QA, you should be technical enough to set it by yourself, if you
are having some issues then you can call them for help but don't
get your all jobs done by developers. This will definitely affect
the productivity of the development team.
• Don't Allow Developers to Inadvertently Code
When someone finds a bug in production, they always complain
about how QA missed that bug. What should also be taken into
consideration is how did our programmer code the bug? The key idea
of the BDD is to avoid creating bugs in the first place. The
question here, is how do you help prevent developers from
inadvertently coding bugs. Here are few things you could do:
1. Test the features as implemented. Testing features one by one
can help to verify that implementation is well
2. Make sure the developer understands the functionality properly
by looking into the code.
3. Keep keen watch on CI if the developer's check-ins are breaking
• Don't Miss Any Scenario. That Would Be a
A good understanding of the concept, coupled with deep thinking
about all possibilities, will result in a comprehensive set of
scenarios for some particular functionality. Remember, if you miss
a scenario, it means you have added defect into the system. To
avoid this, it is good practice to involve everybody from team in
the scenario design process.
Beware of the BDD pitfalls
• Flaky, Brittle & Slow Tests
BDD is all about keeping business and technology engaged. Flaky
tests means tests failing randomly without proper reason. Test
failure is expensive, so business and non-technical people become
frustrated and start loosing interest in the tests. Brittle tests
mean too much detail and result in features that are boring to
read. Business people hate reading scenarios with steps giving lot
of information about the system. Brittle features have lots of
"AND" in them. In addition, tests that are slow to run are annoying
Tip: Use robust test automation strategies for implementation,
which makes tests reliable, fast and readable.
• Lack of Collaboration
Communication enhancement can be achieved through proper
channels, which keeps business people interested in the
Tip: Use proper collaboration tools to bridge communication
• The Business Not Reading Feature Files
Think of it from the business' view. If you wrote feature file
which has lot of implementation details like 'click here, click
there', a business stakeholder is definitely going to loose a lot
of interest when reading the feature files.
Tip: Write better quality feature files to keep business
• Frequent modification and deletion of Scenarios
Frequent modification in the feature files indicates that team
hasn't understood requirements clearly and therefore, probably a
result of a lack of proper communication.
Tip: Effective collaboration & good scenario design may
• Information Loss
Information loss means leaking of an information while
communicating with others who were not involved. Information loss
is quite often when there are few people involved in the early
stage of the project. When those people unable to communicate 100%
of the requirements to the team then there is information loss.
Information loss causes misunderstandings and misunderstandings are
major cause of bugs.
Tip: Get involved everyone from the scratch to avoid
Working with 'out-side in' software development methodologies
like BDD are always challenging for testers. Use of communication
skills and proper understanding of the process and role will help
in delivering quality products.